The cost of banning animal testing can vary widely depending on the type of testing being done and the scale of operations. Animal testing is an accepted practice in many industries, including pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food products. In some cases, banning this type of testing could be prohibitively expensive, as companies may need to develop alternative methods of testing and research. In other cases, it could be relatively inexpensive, as companies may be able to make use of existing non-animal testing methods. Ultimately, the cost of banning animal testing would depend on the specific industry, the testing being conducted, and the availability of alternative methods.

Is it cheaper to not test on animals?

It is generally more cost effective to not test on animals, as there are more affordable and reliable alternatives. For example, computer models, cell cultures, and in-vitro testing are some of the alternatives available. Additionally, there are also ethical considerations to take into account when it comes to animal testing. Therefore, if cost and ethical considerations are a factor, then it may be better to not test on animals.